Sunday, July 31, 2016

Where Small Companies Can Begin with GFSI

The rising acceptance of GFSI is catching the attention of smaller food manufacturers.


Many small companies are working with limited resources and as a result, employees wear a variety of different hats. As they look to begin the process of selecting a GFSI scheme, the process can be daunting. Where should they start? Which scheme makes the most sense? In an interview with Rick Biros, publisher of Food Safety Tech, Claudio Bauza discusses where small food companies can begin their journey.

Source: foodsafetytech.com

Thursday, July 28, 2016

Still Time to Register for August Training - Registration Ends July 29th


FSPCA Preventive Controls For Human Food
August 3, 2016 - August 5, 2016

Register HERE
Download Flyer HERE

Schedule 
3 sessions 
1. August 3, 2016
8:00 AM – 5:00 PM (PDT) 
2. August 4, 2016 
8:00 AM – 5:00 PM (PDT) 
3. August 5, 2016 
8:00 AM – 12:00 PM (PDT)

Location 
Spring Hills Suites Napa Valley, 101 Gateway Rd East
Napa, CA 94558 

Registration

1-4 Attendees – $1,095.00 (USD) Registration is for 1 attendee, addtional guests/attendess can be added during the registration process.

5+ Attendees -  Save $60 per attendee – $1035.00 (USD) Early Bird discount for 5+ only available for attendees from same company.

The FSPCA training materials are designed to meet the requirements for training under Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations Part 117.155 for the Preventive Controls “Qualified Individual” who conducts Food Safety Plan activities such as developing and reviewing a food safety plan, validating preventive controls, verifying and validating process controls among others. Attending an FSPCA course will provide assurances that the course content and resulting knowledge is consistent with regulatory expectations. Each facility registered with the FDA is required to have a Preventive Control Qualified Individual PCQI.

A preventive controls qualified individual is a person who has successfully completed training in the development and application of risk-based preventive controls at least equivalent to that received under the standardized curriculum from FSPCA.

The FSPCA program is based on collaboration among federal and state regulatory officials (FDA), academic food safety researchers and educators, and U.S. food industry representatives. This program is delivered by a FSPCA Lead Instructor.

This course meets the Preventive Controls Qualified Individual Training requirements. The participants will receive FSPCA Preventive Controls Qualified Individual certificate issued by AFDO.

Includes: Morning and afternoon snack breaks, Lunch, Course Materials and Certificate of Attendance.

Parking – Free parking

Hotel Booking - Spring Hill Suites 707-253-1900

REGISTRATION CLOSES ON July 29, no refunds will be given after that date. Registrations may be transferred to another person from the same organization for the scheduled class. Cancellation fee before July 29, 2016: $250.00

Monday, July 25, 2016

FSMA Preventive Controls: Are You Prepared?

By Bill Bremer
Table I. Kestrel Management’s self-diagnostic tool can help a company assess its level of preparedness for FSMA compliance.

Assessing your company’s readiness level is a crucial part of the compliance process.

Compliance to FSMA has presented a new and difficult challenge for industry, the public and the FDA since it passed on January 4, 2011. With compliance dates for the initial FSMA rule—Preventive Controls—coming in September 2016, food sites must establish plans now to meet the impending deadline.

Complying with the Preventive Controls Rule The Preventive Controls Rule was published September 17, 2015, with the compliance date for registered companies (more than 500 employees) scheduled for September 19, 2016. The compliance date is one year later for companies with fewer than 500 employees, unless otherwise specified under FSMA.

Under the FSMA rules, registered food facilities must evaluate and implement preventive control provisions and meet the requirements and the approaching deadline. The most urgent concerns for companies subject to the Preventive Controls Rule include developing a Preventive Controls Program, identifying a Preventive Control Qualified Individual (PCQI), and implementing a Food Safety Plan.

The following areas are all included under the FSMA Preventive Controls Rule:

  • Hazard Analysis. Companies must identify and evaluate known and reasonably foreseeable hazards.
  • Preventive Controls. Preventive controls must be implemented to significantly minimize or prevent the occurrence of hazards.
  • Monitoring. Preventive controls must be monitored for effectiveness.
  • Corrective Actions. Procedures for addressing failures of preventive controls and prevention of affected food from entering commerce are required.
  • Verification. Facilities are required to verify that preventive controls, monitoring and corrective actions are adequate.
  • Recordkeeping. Records must be kept for two years.
  • Written Plan and Documentation. A written plan must document and describe procedures used to comply with requirements.
  • Qualified Individual. A Qualified Individual who has been adequately trained must be present at the facility to manage the preventive controls for the site and the products processed and distributed at/from the site.

Failure to implement Preventive Controls (a.k.a., Hazard Analysis and Risk-based Preventive Controls (HARPC)) for qualified sites may result in fines and possible jail sentences.

Self-Diagnostic Assessment Tool

The following self-diagnostic assessment tool can help organizations better determine their current state of planning for FSMA compliance (see Table I). To complete your own planning assessment, review your progress compared to the questions below.

Get Compliance-Ready

Companies must have their training, planning and development underway to comply, or face possible violations, fines, and penalties under FDA enforcement. The questions in Table I will help companies identify the areas in which they need to focus attention. Kestrel can also help answer questions, provide input on solutions, discuss how to better manage the preventive controls program—and change “No” responses into “Yes” responses that promote best practices for FSMA compliance.

Article Source:  https://foodsafetytech.com/column/fsma-preventive-controls-prepared/

Friday, July 22, 2016

REGISTRATION REMINDER for August Training


FSPCA Preventive Controls For Human Food
August 3, 2016 - August 5, 2016

Register HERE
Download Flyer HERE

Schedule 
3 sessions 
1. August 3, 2016
8:00 AM – 5:00 PM (PDT) 
2. August 4, 2016 
8:00 AM – 5:00 PM (PDT) 
3. August 5, 2016 
8:00 AM – 12:00 PM (PDT)

Location 
Spring Hills Suites Napa Valley, 101 Gateway Rd East
Napa, CA 94558 

Registration

1-4 Attendees – $1,095.00 (USD) Registration is for 1 attendee, addtional guests/attendess can be added during the registration process.

5+ Attendees -  Save $60 per attendee – $1035.00 (USD) Early Bird discount for 5+ only available for attendees from same company.

The FSPCA training materials are designed to meet the requirements for training under Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations Part 117.155 for the Preventive Controls “Qualified Individual” who conducts Food Safety Plan activities such as developing and reviewing a food safety plan, validating preventive controls, verifying and validating process controls among others. Attending an FSPCA course will provide assurances that the course content and resulting knowledge is consistent with regulatory expectations. Each facility registered with the FDA is required to have a Preventive Control Qualified Individual PCQI.

A preventive controls qualified individual is a person who has successfully completed training in the development and application of risk-based preventive controls at least equivalent to that received under the standardized curriculum from FSPCA.

The FSPCA program is based on collaboration among federal and state regulatory officials (FDA), academic food safety researchers and educators, and U.S. food industry representatives. This program is delivered by a FSPCA Lead Instructor.

This course meets the Preventive Controls Qualified Individual Training requirements. The participants will receive FSPCA Preventive Controls Qualified Individual certificate issued by AFDO.

Includes: Morning and afternoon snack breaks, Lunch, Course Materials and Certificate of Attendance.

Parking – Free parking

Hotel Booking - Spring Hill Suites 707-253-1900

REGISTRATION CLOSES ON July 29, no refunds will be given after that date. Registrations may be transferred to another person from the same organization for the scheduled class. Cancellation fee before July 29, 2016: $250.00

Tuesday, July 19, 2016

Five Errors That Impact GFSI Compliance



By Jason Dea

The Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) is a global initiative for the continuous improvement of food safety management systems. From a functional standpoint, you might be surprised to learn that one of the most challenging elements of keeping up with GFSI compliance for many food producers is sufficient document control. In fact, data compiled by SQF shows that document control-related issues are one of the most common sources of a non-conformance during GFSI-benchmarked audits. Examples of these non-conformances are associated with documentation of training requirements, business continuity planning, and corrective and preventative actions.

The Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) is an industry-driven initiative providing thought leadership and guidance on food safety management systems necessary for safety along the supply chain. This work is accomplished through collaboration between the world’s leading food safety experts from retail, manufacturing and food service companies, as well as international organizations, governments, academia and service providers to the global food industry. They meet together at technical working group and stakeholder meetings, conferences and regional events to share knowledge and promote a harmonized approach to managing food safety across the industry. GFSI is facilitated by The Consumer Goods Forum (CGF), a global, parity-based industry network, driven by its members.

So what exactly are some of the most common causes for document control issues as it relates to non-conformances? Keep an eye out for the following five errors that can affect compliance.

1. Lack of document control altogether
Lack of correct usage of document control in the context of GFSI compliance is a common error. This is an issue that often occurs as a result of document sprawl—specifically as it pertains to duplicate documents and supporting documents. For example, an organization might create internal reference material designed to be cheat sheets or summaries of larger policies. These could include simple charts that list key equipment set-up parameters or charts summarizing abbreviated information from product specification sheets. Many organizations fail to realize that because of the nature of the information in these files, these reference documents must also be included in their document control program to ensure that the information in them is current and universally applied.

2. Document version control
From using outdated forms to referencing outdated employee procedures, lack of proper document version control and enforcement is the most common GFSI compliance-related non-conformance. These issues can arise from operational errors (employees don’t know where to find up-to-date documentation or how to ensure that it is being used) to technical errors (the document control system is unable to properly manage document versioning, or in the case of home-grown document control software systems, they may be unable to do so altogether). To avoid these errors, it’s necessary to establish where controlled versions of documents are located and ensure that they are kept up to date. It’s also important remove obsolete versions of these documents—this is a basic principle of document control, but it’s often an area where errors compound over time. Reinforcing training so employees are made aware of document control best practices and policies is critical to keeping your compliance activities current.

3. Document revision errors
One of the most common activities and most common sources of error within any document control program involves publishing revisions to documents. These errors include:
  • Updating the contents of a document but forgetting to update information such as the version number
  • Improper tracking of revision history
  • Adding new documents to the database rather than revising or updating existing documents

4. Inclusion of documents from external sources
If your food safety management system includes or makes use of external documents, these must be controlled in the same manner in which you control internal documents.

Some examples of external documents that may need to be included in your document control program include:
  • Sample labels provided by your chemical and pest management suppliers
  • Raw material specifications provided by your suppliers
  • Customer expectations manuals provided by your customers

5. Improper identification of approval personnel
A best practice of document control is for the person knowledgeable about the content of a document to be assigned the responsibility of approving updates to it. In many organizations, this is interpreted to mean that all approval responsibilities are assigned to a single person across the organization. This could be the food safety coordinator or the document control administrator, despite the fact that it is not reasonable for a single person to be knowledgeable about all the procedures across the organization.

A better approach to approval responsibilities is to identify individuals who can be responsible for authorizing changes based on function or discipline. By spreading the responsibilities across more people, your document control program is more likely to be current and accurate.

When it comes to food safety compliance and best practices, particularly as they relate to GFSI, it’s often the basic principles that get overlooked once your organizations processes and systems are up and running. Setting up a process for document control and maintaining this process over time is a key to achieving and maintaining compliance. As such, it’s important to revisit your controlled document process and library regularly to ensure things are operating as designed and avoid costly compliance surprises at the same time.

Article Source: https://foodsafetytech.com/feature_article/five-errors-impact-gfsi-compliance/

Saturday, July 16, 2016

Register for the August FSPCA Preventive Controls for Human Food Industry Training



FSPCA Preventive Controls For Human Food
August 3, 2016 - August 5, 2016

Register HERE
Download Flyer HERE

Schedule 
3 sessions 
1. August 3, 2016
8:00 AM – 5:00 PM (PDT) 
2. August 4, 2016 
8:00 AM – 5:00 PM (PDT) 
3. August 5, 2016 
8:00 AM – 12:00 PM (PDT)

Location 
Spring Hills Suites Napa Valley, 101 Gateway Rd East
Napa, CA 94558 

Registration

1-4 Attendees – $1,095.00 (USD) Registration is for 1 attendee, addtional guests/attendess can be added during the registration process.

5+ Attendees -  Save $60 per attendee – $1035.00 (USD) Early Bird discount for 5+ only available for attendees from same company.

The FSPCA training materials are designed to meet the requirements for training under Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations Part 117.155 for the Preventive Controls “Qualified Individual” who conducts Food Safety Plan activities such as developing and reviewing a food safety plan, validating preventive controls, verifying and validating process controls among others. Attending an FSPCA course will provide assurances that the course content and resulting knowledge is consistent with regulatory expectations. Each facility registered with the FDA is required to have a Preventive Control Qualified Individual PCQI.

A preventive controls qualified individual is a person who has successfully completed training in the development and application of risk-based preventive controls at least equivalent to that received under the standardized curriculum from FSPCA.

The FSPCA program is based on collaboration among federal and state regulatory officials (FDA), academic food safety researchers and educators, and U.S. food industry representatives. This program is delivered by a FSPCA Lead Instructor.

This course meets the Preventive Controls Qualified Individual Training requirements. The participants will receive FSPCA Preventive Controls Qualified Individual certificate issued by AFDO.

Includes: Morning and afternoon snack breaks, Lunch, Course Materials and Certificate of Attendance.

Parking – Free parking

Hotel Booking - Spring Hill Suites 707-253-1900

REGISTRATION CLOSES ON July 29, no refunds will be given after that date. Registrations may be transferred to another person from the same organization for the scheduled class. Cancellation fee before July 29, 2016: $250.00

Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Superior Food Safety Training Classes

 We offer the following training classes:

HACCPP

Implementing SQF Training - Version 7.2 - English and Spanish

FSMA Preventive Controls for Human Foods

Internal and External Audits

Crisis Management

Gluten Free Certification Program

Pre-requisite Programs

 
Please visit our website or send us an email  for more information!

Sunday, July 10, 2016

Napa Valley: 10 Fascinating Facts Every Wine Lover Should Know


Enjoy these little fun facts about our beloved Napa Valley next time you are wine tasting, at a dinner party or playing Trivial Pursuit.
1) Napa Valley hosts an annual Mustard Festival from January to March, celebrating the "food, wine, art and rich, unique agricultural bounty of the Napa Valley". For some great tips on pairing wine with mustard, check out this article - Courtney gives some great advice.
2) Napa Valley makes up only five percent of the total United States vineyard acreage. The region of Andalucia in Spain has more wine acreage than anywhere in the world.
3) Sulfur is the pesticide most commonly used in Napa Valley and is certified for use in organic farming. Green wine, anyone?
4) Napa's Chateau Montelena caused a sensation when their 1976 Chardonnay put California wines on the map and beat French wines to take top honors at a Paris blind tasting.  At the time, Napa was still considered a "backwater" wine producing region that could in no way compete with classic French wine. The plucky story was made in to a lovely little movie called "Bottleshock" starring Bill Pullman, which I got to enjoy on a plane ride back from the UK at Christmas.  Pick it up.
5) Stag's Leap 1973 Cabernet Sauvignon further cemented Napa's global image when it won in the red category for that same 1976 Paris blind tasting - and came back to take top honors again in 1986 with their 1972 Clos du Val Cabernet Sauvignon.
6) In the 1830's, George Yount planted the first grapevines in Napa Valley (they were from Mexico), after declaring, "In such a place I should love to clear the land and make my home. In such a place I should love to live and die." He founded the town that was eventually named Yountville in his honor, home to such dining delights as Bistro Jeanty and The French Laundry.
7) Viticulture and tourism top the list of Napa industries.  And you can combine them both with wine tours and a great dinner out! Ah, two of my favorite things....
8) The Valley itself is roughly 30 miles long and a few miles wide.  If you can actually hit every winery over the course of one weekend, however, then I'd like to shake your hand!
9) The first commercial Napa winery was established by Charles Krug in 1861. John Patchett created the Valley's first commercial vineyard in 1858. From those of us who love wine, we offer our humble thanks.
10) Of the 140 Napa wineries in existence by 1900, the stalwarts that remain are BeaulieuBeringerCharles KrugChateau MontelenaFar Niente, Mayacamas, Markham Vineyards, and Schramsberg. You could put together a little tour of "The Classics" next time you are visiting. Markham in particular is one of my favorite wineries in the area.

Thursday, July 7, 2016

Safe Quality Food Institute Endorses the Gluten-Free Certification Program


The Safe Quality Food (SQF) Program, recognized globally by retailers and foodservice providers who require a rigorous and credible food safety management system, is proud to announce the formation of a strategic partnership with the Allergen Control Group Inc. (ACG), owners of the Gluten-Free Certification Program (GFCP).

As the gluten-free market continues to forecast high-growth, brand owners who are committed to protecting their name require increased food safety and verified evidence before making regulated gluten-free claims. SQFI recognizes that the GFCP is a quality program and recommends the GFCP to suppliers seeking a gluten-free certification.

The Gluten-Free Certification Program (GFCP) is a voluntary science-based program designed for manufacturers and brand owners committed to producing safe, reliable gluten-free products for consumers suffering from celiac disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. The program requires the implementation of stringent, risk based and preventative gluten-free controls, which easily combines with a globally recognized food safety management system.

Article Source:  http://www.prweb.com/releases/2016/06/prweb13499318.htm

Friday, July 1, 2016

Certified to FSSC 22000? You’re Ready for FSMA

By Maria Fontanazza


A look at how certification to the GFSI recognized scheme aligns with FSMA in supplier controls, a food safety plan, audit readiness, and building a strong food safety culture.

If my company is GFSI-certified, is it also FSMA compliant? The answer is: With shared goals of producing safe food, coordinating preventive measures and ensuring continuous improvement, if your company is FSSC 22000 certified, you’re well on the road to FSMA compliance, according to Jacqueline Southee, Ph.D., U.S. Liaison, FSSC 22000. Southee discussed several areas in which FSSC 22000 aligns with FSMA as part of a recent Leadership Series, “GFSI in the Age of FSMA”.

Supply Chain Visibility
FSSC 22000 is applicable to all aspects of the supply chain and requires interactive communication (all of which must be documented), from the downstream level in ensuring raw materials and suppliers meet requirements of ISO 22000 framework to communication with customers and suppliers to verify and control hazards.

FSMA controls the hazard of food within the United States, says Southee, whereas GFSI certification is a global initiative, thereby extending supply chain visibility to foreign suppliers.

The Food Safety Plan
There has been much discussion surrounding building a FSMA-ready food safety plan and the migration from HACCP to HARPC. “HARPC can be referred to as HACCP with preventive controls,” says Southee. FSSC 22000 provides a flexible yet robust approach in a framework that is applicable to all situations (i.e., different manufacturers have different issues, such as producing ice cream versus baked goods). Rather than being prescriptive, the prerequisite program has the flexibility to apply to a particular situation. In addition, validation, verification, monitoring and documentation are an inherent part of the ISO 22000 approach and the FSSC 22000 certification.

FSSC 22000 serves as an effective tool in preparing companies for FSMA compliance. “We’re not a regulatory system; FDA has that domain,” says Southee. “They’re the ones that carry the responsibility of meeting those regulations. We work with everyone…to do the best job we can.”

Audit Readiness
Being audit ready all the time is a key part of preparing for FSMA. FSSC 22000 certifies a food safety management system (a three-year certification cycle) and requires internal audits of company performance, along with helping companies ensure that their records are organized at all times. The goal is to install a management system that enables constant monitoring, reevaluation and assessment as part of an ongoing process of keeping food safe, according to Southee. “If you’re certified and have an effective ongoing management system, unannounced audits won’t be an issue,” she says.

Food Safety Culture
FSSC 22000 and ISO 22000 provide a strong foundation for building food safety culture. ISO 22000 requires proof of management commitment to the food safety process, along with accountability, and for management to make resources available to see the food safety process through. “We agree that culture has to come from the top,” says Southee. “The personnel have to see that management is committed, and the culture will come from that commitment.” It also requires constant communication, up and down the supply chain as well as internally. This includes involving all employees and making sure that they know what they’re doing (i.e., training). “Everyone needs to know they’re valued and important, and how their function contributes to the function of safe food,” says Southee.

FSMA Alignment and Gap Analysis
There are sure to be some gaps when it comes to FSSC 22000 and FSMA. FSSC 22000 has commissioned a gap analysis to compare the preventive controls for human and animal food rules with the GFSI scheme and will add addendums as needed. Areas of review include a requirement to include food fraud into the hazard analysis and a review of unannounced audit protocol.

Article Source: https://foodsafetytech.com